Skip to main content

Evidence to Improve Care

Vaginal Birth After Caesarean (VBAC)

Care for People Who Have Had a Caesarean Birth and Are Planning Their Next Birth

Click below to see a list of brief quality statements and scroll down for more information.​​


Quality standards are sets of concise statements designed to help health care professionals easily and quickly know what care to provide, based on the best evidence. ​

See below for the quality statements and click for more detail.​


Quality Statement 1: Access to Vaginal Birth After Caesarean
People who have had a Caesarean birth before can plan a vaginal birth for their next birth, as long as there is no medical reason not to have one.


Quality Statement 2: Discussion After Caesarean Birth
After a Caesarean birth, people have a discussion with their physician or midwife and receive written information about the reasons for their Caesarean birth and their options for future births.


Quality Statement 3: Shared Decision-Making
Pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth participate in shared decision-making with their physician or midwife. The discussion and planned mode of birth is documented in the perinatal record.


Quality Statement 4: Previous Vaginal Birth
Pregnant people who have had both a previous Caesarean birth and a previous vaginal birth are informed that they have a high likelihood of successful vaginal birth if no contraindication is present.


Quality Statement 5: Operative Reports and Incision Type
Physicians and midwives obtain an operative report from any previous Caesarean births whenever possible. Pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth with an unknown type of uterine incision have an individualized assessment by their physician or midwife to determine the likelihood of a low transverse incision.


Quality Statement 6: Timely Access to Caesarean Birth
Pregnant people planning a vaginal birth after Caesarean are aware of the resources available and not available at their planned place of birth, including physician, midwifery, nursing, anesthesiology, and neonatal care, and the ability to provide timely access to Caesarean birth.


Quality Statement 7: Unplanned Labour
Pregnant people planning an elective repeat Caesarean section should have a documented discussion with their physician or midwife about the feasibility of vaginal birth after Caesarean if they go into unplanned labour. This discussion should take place during antenatal care and again if the person arrives at the hospital in labour.


Quality Statement 8: Induction and Augmentation of Labour
Pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth are offered induction and/or oxytocin augmentation of labour when medically indicated, and are informed by their physician or midwife about the potential benefits and harms associated with the method proposed. Discussion about this should begin in the antenatal period.


Quality Statement 9: Signs and Symptoms of Uterine Rupture
During active labour, pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth are closely monitored for signs or symptoms of uterine rupture.


5

Operative Reports and Incision Type

Physicians and midwives obtain an operative report from any previous Caesarean births whenever possible. Pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth with an unknown type of uterine incision have an individualized assessment by their physician or midwife to determine the likelihood of a low transverse incision.


Physicians and midwives should make every effort to obtain an operative report from the previous Caesarean section to develop an appropriate plan of care for people considering a vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC). Physicians and midwives should review the operative report and note the type of uterine incision used, as well as any extensions of the incision, to determine the feasibility of VBAC. A previous classical or inverted “T” uterine scar, a previous myomectomy entering the uterine cavity, or a previous uterine rupture are contraindications to labour after Caesarean.

When the operative report is unavailable, physicians and midwives should discuss and explore specific details of previous Caesarean birth(s) to determine the likelihood of a low transverse uterine incision. Considerations should include the reason for the previous Caesarean, gestational age at the time of the previous Caesarean, and any other relevant clinical details. Any other previous relevant gynecologic history—including other uterine surgeries or interventions—should be considered and documented. If the likelihood of a low transverse incision is high, labour after Caesarean can be offered with informed consent and a discussion of possible increased risks of harm due to uterine rupture. Inability to obtain the previous operative report(s) should be documented.

For Pregnant People

Your physician or midwife should read the report from your previous Caesarean birth. If they don’t know the type of scar on your uterus from your previous Caesarean birth, they should help determine whether a vaginal birth after Caesarean is right for you.


For Clinicians

Obtain operative reports from previous Caesarean births whenever possible to develop an appropriate plan of care. Inability to obtain the operative record should be documented, and VBAC may still be offered with shared decision-making. Document the discussion and planned mode of birth. When the incision type used in the previous Caesarean birth is unknown, assess the person’s preference and the clinical circumstances surrounding the previous Caesarean birth to determine whether VBAC is feasible.


For Health Services

Ensure that physicians and midwives and facilities have the necessary resources, systems, and processes in place to obtain and send operative reports from previous Caesarean births in a timely way whenever possible. When the incision type used in the previous Caesarean birth is unknown, ensure that physicians and midwives are equipped with the knowledge and skills to assess the clinical circumstances surrounding previous Caesarean birth and determine whether VBAC is feasible.

Process Indicators

Percentage of pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth whose physician or midwife makes a documented attempt to obtain the operative report from the previous Caesarean birth

  • Denominator: number of pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth

  • Numerator: number of people in the denominator whose physician or midwife makes a documented attempt to obtain the operative report from the previous Caesarean birth

  • Data source: local data collection


Percentage of pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth with an unknown type of uterine incision and have a documented individualized assessment to determine whether VBAC is feasible

  • Denominator: number of pregnant people who have had a previous Caesarean birth with an unknown type of uterine incision

  • Numerator: number of people in the denominator who have a documented individualized assessment to determine whether VBAC is feasible

  • Data source: local data collection

Uterine incision

The type of cut made to the uterus during Caesarean birth. This may be different than the incision made in the skin. Low transverse, a horizontal incision in the lower uterus, is the most common type used in Canada and has a lower risk of uterine rupture than other types of incisions.


Individualized assessment

Assessment that includes the circumstances of the previous Caesarean birth, the person’s values and preferences, the person’s risk profile, and clinical factors relevant to the current pregnancy and fetal health during labour.

Let’s make our health system healthier

Join Our Patient, Family and Public Advisors Program

Patients, families and the public are central to improving health quality.


Man smiling

Sign up for our newsletter

Are you passionate about quality health care for all Ontarians? Stay in-the-know about our newest programs, reports and news.

Health Quality Connect - Health Quality Ontario's newsletter - on an iPad and a cell phone